Click Here For The Home Page
HOME






CNBC Says "Mike South - South is the Nikki Finke of the porn industry. His blog, which is never short on opinion, is a must-read among industry insiders. His style is unique, but he is also a leading agent of change within the industry. There are few fence-sitters when it comes to opinions about South, but no one ignores him."

Recent Comments

  • If the FSC Wins Who Will Exlain To Performers That They Now Have To Pay For AntiBiotic Shots Every Two Weeks, Whether They Need Them Or Not (9)
    • jilted: Mike, there is documented, irrefutable proof of the rates of HPV in the industry. It is astonishing, and scarier than hell. The number of...
    • phyllisha: Medicating the whole industry is not the answer. Just suck it up put the stupid condom on, use every camera trick and then some to hide...
    • LurkingReader: Trolled MikeSouth twitter and went to the doxycycline site. https://www.drugs.com/doxycycl ine.html Not mentioned there is the...
    • MikeSouth: I agree its a horrible idea for all the reasons yall mentioned and then some but it is the truth….a lot of porn chicks dont...
    • herculestheliger: I didn’t even bother addressing the biweekly antibiotic shot before because of the absurdity of it. Not only is it a...
    • Ivy: That the FSC is proposing antibiotic shots for performers is so dangerous, it really pisses me off. I can barely even be articulate about it,...
    • Karmafan: Maybe someone should ask a bunch of real Doctors if its OK to give antibiotics every 2 weeks to people that are not sick on the chance...
    • kedog: I wonder why noone has noticed how bad an idea it is to get antibiotics every two weeks. Also doxy can interfere with hormonal birth control.
  • Taking The Pregnancy Thing A Step Further (50)
    • mharris127: I read the PBS article you linked, Lurk. It is very interesting — there is a theory that BV can increase HIV transmission in...
    • mharris127: Thanks, Lurk. I have several articles bookmarked to read and will read this one as well. Unfortunately the scholarly articles I found...

An Interesting Read On Measure B

Michael Fattarossi has written an interesting opinion on the law here

According to California Law  even if the measure passes it is unenforceable in any given city until the city adopts the measure into a city code. he cites this:

This does appear to be the case, it also exempts Vernon, Pasadena and Long Beach because they have their own Health Departments, so they would each have to have a ballot initiative on the issue.

So even if the law does pass cities in the Valley where porn is shot like Chatsworth, Woodland Hills etc, would have to bring up the issue at a local city council meeting and vote it in, opening a whole new can of worms….

Assume that most cities would go along but what about, say Chatsworth  they may be disinclined to go along, creating a conflict locally between those who want it and those who don’t, and if every city BUT Chatsworth adopts it how will the residents of Chatsworth feel about essentially being the place where all porn is shot?

This sets up an interesting dynamic…maybe Fabian should be spending his money at the local levels to fight this not county wide where it seems assured to pass.

Locally the voters won’t make the choice, the city leaders will.

It is also unclear if it just includes the inspection parts and the penalties can still be assessed on companies based in LA County, or if non condom releases can be cause for denial of the license required to shoot adult by the measure.