<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coming Condom Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-coming-condom-law</link>
	<description>The oldest porn news and gossip site on the net.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeSouth</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>I can offer you some insight, how&#039;s that.

Truth is despite what the mass media would have you believe HIV transmission, is almost non existant in gay couples who only practice unprotected oral, even when one partner is HIV positive.  The HIV Virus is rather weak and saliva has been show to kill it. It also needs a direct path to the bloodstream, which oral generally doesn&#039;t provide.

Assuming you have no open sores in your mouth/on your face oral/facials are not a risky behavior for HIV transmission.  

As Julie pointed out you can contract other STDs that way but it is actually a more difficult transmission method. (Thats why most prostitutes will do bare back oral but not bareback sex)

All that said if Cal-OSHA gets their fingers in this direct contact with semen is going to become unlikely, again something that would appeal to both Democrats and Republicans.

The &quot;appearance&quot; of condom use on the part of the industry could be argued to hold the would be legislation at bay, but we will never know if that would have worked or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can offer you some insight, how's that.</p>
<p>Truth is despite what the mass media would have you believe HIV transmission, is almost non existant in gay couples who only practice unprotected oral, even when one partner is HIV positive.  The HIV Virus is rather weak and saliva has been show to kill it. It also needs a direct path to the bloodstream, which oral generally doesn't provide.</p>
<p>Assuming you have no open sores in your mouth/on your face oral/facials are not a risky behavior for HIV transmission.  </p>
<p>As Julie pointed out you can contract other STDs that way but it is actually a more difficult transmission method. (Thats why most prostitutes will do bare back oral but not bareback sex)</p>
<p>All that said if Cal-OSHA gets their fingers in this direct contact with semen is going to become unlikely, again something that would appeal to both Democrats and Republicans.</p>
<p>The "appearance" of condom use on the part of the industry could be argued to hold the would be legislation at bay, but we will never know if that would have worked or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backspace</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>backspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m clearly not a health expert so can someone explain what&#039;s the point of using condoms during penetration scenes when the performers still practice oral and facials unprotected?  that&#039;s gotta be one of the biggest contradictions i see in porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i'm clearly not a health expert so can someone explain what's the point of using condoms during penetration scenes when the performers still practice oral and facials unprotected?  that's gotta be one of the biggest contradictions i see in porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeSouth</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2470</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2470</guid>
		<description>Nah I just believe in giving credit where it is due.

meaning I didn&#039;t give it to you, you earned it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah I just believe in giving credit where it is due.</p>
<p>meaning I didn't give it to you, you earned it <img src='http://www.mikesouth.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliemeadows</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2469</link>
		<dc:creator>juliemeadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2469</guid>
		<description>Thank you both. Gracious as ever. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both. Gracious as ever. <img src='http://www.mikesouth.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>Glad it worked out. And, Julie, the Sardo&#039;s blog is great. Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad it worked out. And, Julie, the Sardo's blog is great. Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeSouth</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2467</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2467</guid>
		<description>never feel bad for that Julie, my readers are bright enough to scroll down and read all the new posts.

Out of all the things I have done in my 17 years in this biz I think asking you to blog was the best

Thanks BT, you turned me on to a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never feel bad for that Julie, my readers are bright enough to scroll down and read all the new posts.</p>
<p>Out of all the things I have done in my 17 years in this biz I think asking you to blog was the best</p>
<p>Thanks BT, you turned me on to a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliemeadows</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>juliemeadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>I definitely think condoms should be taken seriously. Football players wear helmets, and performers are like athletes. The least we can do for these people who risk their health to entertain us is find a way to enjoy them even if they are wearing a condom. 

All I can say for facials is that at least saliva has a lot of bacteria-killing properties. It doesn&#039;t protect the facial skin from herpes, and therefore, herpes outbreaks, but very few diseases are contracted through the mouth. And now, of course, as I type that I remember that a performer friend got gonorrhea in her throat after a scene and nearly suffocated on the way to the hospital. Never mind. :(

I love this post. I feel bad, Mike, for posting mine, just now, on top of this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think condoms should be taken seriously. Football players wear helmets, and performers are like athletes. The least we can do for these people who risk their health to entertain us is find a way to enjoy them even if they are wearing a condom. </p>
<p>All I can say for facials is that at least saliva has a lot of bacteria-killing properties. It doesn't protect the facial skin from herpes, and therefore, herpes outbreaks, but very few diseases are contracted through the mouth. And now, of course, as I type that I remember that a performer friend got gonorrhea in her throat after a scene and nearly suffocated on the way to the hospital. Never mind. <img src='http://www.mikesouth.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I love this post. I feel bad, Mike, for posting mine, just now, on top of this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Lindsey. BTW - I&#039;m not advocating for or against condoms in porn. As a consumer, I don&#039;t really mind seeing condoms during sex, but I do enjoy facials. All I&#039;m saying is that I can completely understand how Cal-OSHA or the state Dept. of Health could easily pass a regulation or law that would withstand a court review. Freedom of expression does not include the right to pass on a sexually-transmitted disease. Aren&#039;t brothels in Nevada regulated, and aren&#039;t condoms mandatory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lindsey. BTW - I'm not advocating for or against condoms in porn. As a consumer, I don't really mind seeing condoms during sex, but I do enjoy facials. All I'm saying is that I can completely understand how Cal-OSHA or the state Dept. of Health could easily pass a regulation or law that would withstand a court review. Freedom of expression does not include the right to pass on a sexually-transmitted disease. Aren't brothels in Nevada regulated, and aren't condoms mandatory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>some of the biggest porn sites on the planet use condoms. its time for them to be in all productions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of the biggest porn sites on the planet use condoms. its time for them to be in all productions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey Lovehands</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/comment-page-1/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Lovehands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/the-coming-condom-law-3090/#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>BT well said and 100% spot-on...Mike and I have been talking about this issue ad-nauseum for months...in fact I even wrote an article several months back about it...AIM is obviously a joke, which incidently is the reason I have scoffed at the dozens of offers I get each and every month to go to shoot in LA.  I could probably make between $15,000-25,000 at a pop going there to shoot for a couple weeks at a time but I don&#039;t want to...btw, I&#039;m moved in and working on a new article for this blog...should be posted soon..thanks for all the kind words from everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT well said and 100% spot-on...Mike and I have been talking about this issue ad-nauseum for months...in fact I even wrote an article several months back about it...AIM is obviously a joke, which incidently is the reason I have scoffed at the dozens of offers I get each and every month to go to shoot in LA.  I could probably make between $15,000-25,000 at a pop going there to shoot for a couple weeks at a time but I don't want to...btw, I'm moved in and working on a new article for this blog...should be posted soon..thanks for all the kind words from everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

