Click Here For The Home Page
HOME


Staff, Contributing Editors:

Steve Lick

Recent Comments

New Videos

An Insider Responds

ICM basically came to Manwin begging to support them. The four main things Manwin told them we absolutely needed were:
1) Stuart or any other ICM goon has to step down from IFFOR
2) They have to lower prices immediately by at LEAST 10 USDs, but we tried for much more than that. There is no reason why it should be more than 30 or so USD
3) Manwin asked them to allow some simple way to register typo domains together with the main registration. For free. Like 2 or 3 obvious typos.
4) an easy way to block typo domains together with normal blocks.
Manwin did not ask for thousands of free domains just for us, they threw around 200 or 300 of them at us the first second we talked. First year only of course. They are also the ones that suggested that Manwin run tube.xxx for example.
In regards to IFFOR rules, Manwin said we want to be sure that no stupid rules would be introduced, the "no tubes on .xxx" was just an example.

Did Manwin Make an Offer To Support .XXX?

 

According to documents filed with the court asking the court to dismiss the Manwin/Digital Playground lawsuit They did:

“Thylmann again approached ICM, ostensibly interested in doing business with us,” Lawley stated in his declaration. “He also said that he was planning to start his own adult industry trade group, consisting of the two or three ‘powerhouses’ of the industry (including Manwin), using organizations such as the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America as models…. He said that such a group was necessary because the Free Speech Coalition (a trade group representing certain segments of the adult industry) was not in a position to provide any real value for its members.

“After making these statements, Thylmann then set forth a list of ‘nonnegotiable’ demands to be met by ICM in order for Manwin to consider conducting business with ICM,” the declaration continues. “Thylmann stated that he would ‘tie up ICM in litigation’ if ICM did not meet all of his demands.”

According to both Lawley and Dumas, by October the demands included:
•    Allocation of several thousand dot-xxx domain names to Manwin free of charge.
•    ICM’s commitment to circumvent its policy development body, the International Foundation for Online Responsibility, particularly with regard to the operation of tube sites within dot-xxx.
•    Across-the-board discounts on dot-xxx domain registrations.
•    Allocation of so-called “premium” domains, including Tube.xxx, to be operated by Manwin under a revenue-sharing agreement with ICM.
“Thylmann further stated that in order to explain Manwin’s change of heart regarding .XXX, ICM had to agree to concessions that would put a positive ‘spin’ on Manwin’s involvement, namely, that it would appear that Manwin accomplished some positive impact for the adult industry when news of the deal was announced,” Lawley’s declaration notes.

Now I am no fan of Stuart Lawley, he is a known liar and scum bag, but then Manwin isn't exactly known for being forthright either.  In a perfect world they will both kill each other but sadly that wont happen.

There's more coming on Manwin  LOTS more and at least one of them is a BOMB....stay tuned.

 

Take Down Piracy

File Sharing Sites Falling Left And Right

Last week in a move seen by most as a condolence fuck you to Hollywood for not passing SOPA the Us Department of Justice took down the worlds largest filesharing site, megaupload.  Megaupload wasn't that big in the porn circles but in terms of hollywood movies it was the biggest.

From the DOJ Press release:

The indictment alleges that the criminal enterprise is led by Kim Dotcom, aka Kim Schmitz and Kim Tim Jim Vestor, 37, a resident of both Hong Kong and New Zealand. Dotcom founded Megaupload Limited and is the director and sole shareholder of Vestor Limited, which has been used to hold his ownership interests in the Mega-affiliated sites.

 

In addition, the following alleged members of the Mega conspiracy were charged in the indictment:

  • Finn Batato, 38, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the chief marketing officer;
  • Julius Bencko, 35, a citizen and resident of Slovakia, who is the graphic designer;
  • Sven Echternach, 39, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the head of business development;
  • Mathias Ortmann, 40, a citizen of Germany and resident of both Germany and Hong Kong, who is the chief technical officer, co-founder and director;
  • Andrus Nomm, 32, a citizen of Estonia and resident of both Turkey and Estonia, who is a software programmer and head of the development software division;
  • Bram van der Kolk, aka Bramos, 29, a Dutch citizen and resident of both the Netherlands and New Zealand, who oversees programming and the underlying network structure for the Mega conspiracy websites.

Dotcom, Batato, Ortmann and van der Kolk were arrested today in Auckland, New Zealand, by New Zealand authorities, who executed provisional arrest warrants requested by the United States. Bencko, Echternach and Nomm remain at large. Today, law enforcement also executed more than 20 search warrants in the United States and eight countries, seized approximately $50 million in assets and targeted sites where Megaupload has servers in Ashburn, Va., Washington, D.C., the Netherlands and Canada. In addition, the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va., ordered the seizure of 18 domain names associated with the alleged Mega conspiracy.

The interesting thing about this is that since most of the large porn filesharing sites have shut their doors or limited download capabilities to only what YOU have uploaded.  Rapidshare, filesonic and others have thrown in the towel making even bigger targets out of the few that remain like wupload and oron, expect them to follow suit.

Finally the good guys catch a break, hopefully the tube sites are next....yup thats you Fabian/Manwin.

 

 

The AVN Awards “A Cluster Fuck”

My guy at the AVN Awards called me.  He said dude "It was a cluster fuck"

You didn't need to stay but a few minutes to know all the winners, I should have texted them to you before they were announced...I could have.  As everyone was being seated the winners were being shown on the screens....

There were issues with the teleprompter all night and clips played with no audio and or were delyaed.

The biggest gaff of the night...they forgot to award Best Feature Film and Female Performer of the Year

By the time they figured it out the final dance number was over and half the audience had left.

According to my guy...."It was the worst AVN Show ever"

Just Damn......

My Opinion Of Newt Gingrich

 

I got a call this morning from a polling company and one of the questions was:

"Did the interview with Newt's ex wife Mary Anne Gingrich change your opinion of Newt Gingrich?"

I answered no, absolutely not, I knew he was a complete scumbag before I ever heard that interview.

She laughed and thanked me for my participation.

Are We A Nation Of Morons?

I am absolutely appalled at what I have seen the last couple of days....

For one we have Google, wikipedia and others participating in an online protest over SOPA legislation.  We also have Los Angeles passing a condom mandate, and let me tell ya porners are all up in arms, threatening to leave L.A. ( They won't because nobody else would have them)  They are also threatening to photograph the inspectors and even the drooling imbeciles on ADT are talking about how can this happen in a Democracy...hello you morons we live in a Republic NOT a Democracy.  Yes everyone is all up in arms about something.

Here's my question.  Where was all this uproar when G W Bush and Congress enacted ad signed into law the abhorrent "Patriot Act"?  Where were they when Obama and the Congress made the NDAA 2012 law?  These people usurped 200 year old constitutionally protected rights, they shit on the very document they swore an oath to uphold and where was all the outcry about that?

Fortunately I probably won't live long enough to have to deal with the real repercussions of this.  I  hope I live long enough to see an overthrow of the tyranny that is taking hold in Washington DC but I am not holding my breath.

And what will you people do in 2012?  I know what you will do, you will restaff Washington DC with the same criminal scumbags that got us into this mess, same as you have done every election.  Then you will bitch and moan that it's the other parties fault that it will be more difficult for you to steal porn now.

Then you will kneel and lick the boot of your oppressors.

 

 

The Story Behind the Digital Playground Buy Out

 

Two weeks ago I broke the story that Digital Playground had been purchased by Manwin, the parent company of Brazzers and owner of  controversial tube sites.  A lot of people have been asking "Why did DP sell?" I also heard over the last year " Why isn't DP doing Island Fever any more? Why haven't they started Pirates 3??

Turns out the reasons are all tied together....Read On...

Digital Playground began in 1993 as an adult software company, they broke ground and set the standard for interactive porn utilizing multi angle DVD in particular.  The founders, Samantha and Joone were married and worked hard to make Digital ( DP)  a household name in porn circles.  Their first contract girl was a busty brunette who called herself Rocky Roads.

In those days everyone in porn was successful, the public couldn't get enough product and DP had a plan.

When the company was founded Sam and Joone were set up as equal partners, both had to sign off on anything the company did, like big budget movies.

The company lasted longer than the marriage.  The divorce was amicable in the beginning aand DP launched two big budget but successful brands, one was Island Fever, shot on location in places like Fiji and Bora Bora.  The second was a joint venture with Adam and Eve called Pirates that rode the heels of  Disneys "Pirates of the Caribbean" straight to success.  In the second installment of Pirates DP disassociated themselves from Adam and Eve,

DP pretty much cornered the marked on really high end porn, with lucrative cable deals, pay per view and even R rated versions of some of its movies the money was coming in and they are one of very few companies in porn that are still making good money.

So why no more Pirates or Island Fever and such?  The current top end of their production is just relatively standard porn packaged as higher end product.

Over time and for reasons I won't speculate on, the divorce became MUCH less than amicable, particularly over the last couple of years the fighting has been extremely bitter and even though Joone desperately wanted to continue with the Island Fever and Pirates franchises, Samantha refused to sign off on them, relegating DP to the standard porn fare we have seen from them over the last few years.

Enter Manwin.

With Joone and Samantha hopelessly deadlocked on any new big budget productions the only way he was going to further his passion of big budget porn features was if someone else held the purse strings, and that meant selling the company, for a good deal less than it was worth I am told.

Manwin is positioning themselves to own the cable and high end market and buying Digital Playground is the jewel in that crown, it also breaks the deadlock between Joone and Sam.  You noticed in the announcements that they are keeping Digital Playground as is, including Joone as a Director.  Now he will be free to make the movies he wants to because those are the movies that Manwin wants to make, so in addition to buying DP, they bought Joone as a director.

Now you know the REST of the story.....

 

NDAA…. You better be paying attention. Reader Mail

Brandon Thompsen Writes:

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

While many in the porn industry concern themselves with increasing piracy, low to no profits, and now mandatory condom use in Porn Valley, there are far greater issues at hand that the porn industry, like most of America, continue to remain ignorant of.

Many citizens of the United States are unaware of the reauthorization of National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 that was passed by Congress and signed into law on December 31, 2011. That's right, while many across the nation were preparing to go party and celebrate into the New Year, President Obama signed into law rights for current sitting and future administrations to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone in the world, including Unites States citizens without being afforded due process, a public hearing or trial, and access to an attorney. Let me repeat this again. Including United States citizens.

How can this be, you say? The reason many are unaware of this law and the expansion of the fishing net in the government's "war on terror" is because outside of a signing statement issued by President Obama, where he claims that while his administration can use this provision to detain and arrest US citizens, his will not authorize such action, it is not being reported by any of the mainstream media. In fact, their silence on the issue should be the major alarm most citizens need to confirm that further attack on rights afforded to us under the Constitution is no longer respected nor valued by the elected leaders entrusted to govern us.

For the citizens who are informed and aware of this bill's signage, they have risen up in peaceful protest to help raise awareness and inform other citizens. These individuals have been arrested for exerting their Constitutional rights to protest peacefully. Enemy Expatriation Act.

10/12/2011--Introduced.
Enemy Expatriation Act - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to include engaging in or purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which U.S. nationals would lose their nationality. Defines "hostilities" as any conflict subject to the laws of war.

Supporters of the bill and others that continue to infringe, if not downright defecate on the Bill of Rights, claim that those who are not participating in such activities need not worry as this bill is not aimed at them. The same supporters said the same thing when they passed the PATRIOT ACT and claimed it would never be used against U.S. citizens only to be used in domestic violence and drug trafficking cases.

"I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive."
- Thomas Jefferson

Our forefathers believed in liberty and justice for all. They rose up against the oppression of the British and waged war for their freedom and felt behaving any different were for those that neither deserved freedom or security. Our government has asked demanded the American people sacrifice their liberty in exchange for perceived protection.

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?"
- Thomas Jefferson

It is your duty and obligation to stand up in resistance to tyrannical rulers that care nothing for safety or prosperity; only what they can take from you in their attempt to force compliance and obedience. Look no further than Congress and the President's allegiance to the banking industry and corporations to see where their loyalty lays. Failure to rise against has led to unceremonious conditioning to accept the status-quo of the American citizen much the same way the Jews complied with Hitler. Take note how well their compliance has paid off.

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson

The Federal Government has relied and depended on the laziness of its citizens to take a stand and continue to do so even when the results are not positive. Just last year, many rose up and occupied Wall Street in protest. These individuals were given time to protest under the assumption that they would protest for a couple weeks and then disperse like most normal citizens who give up. When this failed to happen and popularity increased nationally, the protests were no longer tolerated as the people became educated and informed others, threatening the status-quo.

Why should this matter to you? A better question is how can it not? Regardless of industry, career, social status, education, etc. war has been declared on those without power; the United States citizen. Combined with the corporate-run, government-backed media, Americans continue to remain in the dark as more and more of their liberties are stripped away.

Educate yourself. Learn to read between the lines of what is bring reported but more importantly, what isn't being reported and why. Failing to do so now will be no excuse when the police state is in place. Because the person you do business with overseas may be involved in things you have no clue about and you are now suspected and assumed guilty by association even by indirect actions.

We all love to sing about freedom and liberty but now is the time to rise up and inform others to ensure our forefathers' vision is continued on rather than the vision of modern government and the criminals that comprise it.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
- Thomas Jefferson

[ Personally I think George W Bush committed treason when he signed the Patriot Act, i think Barack Obama committed treason when he signed the NDAA of 2012.  They swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and they should both be held accountable for the egregious breach of that oath. ]

The New Condom Law, What Will It mean?

There seems to be some confusion about how the proposed new condom law is going to work.

Most people think that the condom use will be tied to getting the filming permits from the city, this is not exactly the case.

As I read it companies in L.A. who are shooting hardcore are going to have to have permits, for which they will pay a fee and be held in compliance with workplace safety regulations, failure to do so will result in fines and potential revocation of the permit.  Think of it more like a license to shoot porn instead of the traditional one time shooting permits, so it doesn't matter if you don't get a one shoot permit or you shoot on private property, the very product you produce could be used as evidence that you aren't in compliance.

This approach makes it much easier to police and enforce the permit requirements.

Sadly this will be the last nail in the coffin for some of the companies in Porn Valley.  Even more sadly we could have avoided this but we never listened.  for as long as I can remember I have been say that if we cannot regulate ourselves government will do it for us.

The chickens have come home to roost.

What If I Dared Everyone Who Reads This To Vote Accordingly

Andrew Paolo Napolitano (born June 6, 1950) is a former New Jersey Superior Court Judge and now a political and legal analyst for Fox News Channel. Napolitano started on the channel in 1998, and currently serves as the network's senior judicial analyst, commenting on legal news and trials. He also hosts the talk show Freedom Watch on Fox Business Channel.

Source: http://lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano36.1.html

What If Elections Don't Matter?

by Andrew P. Napolitano

What if Democrats and Republicans were two wings of the same bird of prey?

What if elections were actually useful tools of social control? What if they
just provided the populace with meaningless participation in a process that
validates an establishment that never meaningfully changes? What if that
establishment doesn't want and doesn't have the consent of the governed? What if
the two-party system was actually a mechanism used to limit so-called public
opinion? What if there were more than two sides to every issue, but the two
parties wanted to box you in to one of their corners?

What if there's no such thing as public opinion, because every thinking person
has opinions that are uniquely his own? What if public opinion was just a
manufactured narrative that makes it easier to convince people that if their
views are different, there's something wrong with that -- or something wrong
with them?

What if the whole purpose of the Democratic and Republican parties was not to
expand voters' choices, but to limit them? What if the widely perceived
differences between the two parties was just an illusion? What if the heart of
government policy remains the same, no matter who's in the White House? What if
the heart of government policy remains the same, no matter what the people want?

What if those vaunted differences between Democrat and Republican were actually
just minor disagreements? What if both parties just want power and are willing
to have young people fight meaningless wars in order to enhance that power? What
if both parties continue to fight the war on drugs just to give bureaucrats and
cops bigger budgets and more jobs?

What if government policies didn't change when government's leaders did? What if
no matter who won an election, government stayed the same? What if government
was really a revolving door of political hacks, bent on exploiting the people
while they're in charge?

What if both parties supported welfare, war, debt, bailouts and big government?
What if the rhetoric that candidates displayed on the campaign trail was dumped
after electoral victory? What if Barack Obama campaigned as an antiwar,
pro-civil liberties candidate, then waged senseless wars while assaulting your
rights that the Constitution is supposed to protect? What if George W. Bush
campaigned on a platform of nonintervention and small government, then waged a
foreign policy of muscular military intervention and a domestic policy of vast
government borrowing and growth?

What if Bill Clinton declared the era of big government to be over, but actually
just convinced Republicans like Newt Gingrich that they can get what they want
out of big government, too? What if the Republicans went along with it?

What if Ronald Reagan spent six years running for president promising to shrink
government, but then the government grew while he was in office? What if,
notwithstanding Reagan's ideas and cheerfulness and libertarian rhetoric, there
really was no Reagan Revolution?

What if all this is happening again? What if Rick Santorum is being embraced by
voters who want small government even though he voted for the Patriot Act, for
an expansion of Medicare and for raising the debt ceiling by trillions of
dollars? What if Mitt Romney is being embraced by voters who want anyone but
Obama, but don't realize that Romney might as well be Obama on everything from
warfare to welfare?

What if Ron Paul is being ignored by the media not because they claim he's
unappealing or unelectable, but because he doesn't fit into the pre-manufactured
public opinion mold used by the establishment to pigeonhole the electorate and
create the so-called narrative that drives media coverage of elections?

What if the biggest difference between most candidates was not substance but
style? What if those stylistic differences were packaged as substantive ones to
re-enforce the illusion of a difference between Democrats and Republicans? What
if Romney wins and ends up continuing most of the same policies that Obama
promoted? What if Obama's policies, too, are merely extensions of Bush's?

What if a government that manipulated us could be fired? What if a government
that lacked the true and knowing consent of the governed could be dismissed?
What if it were possible to have a game-changer? What if we need a Ron Paul to
preserve and protect our freedoms from assault by the government?

What if we could make elections matter again? What if we could do something
about this?