I. New Realities
In 2014, I wrote a series of articles titled “Over the Rainbow”. My goal was to study the ingredients of the global Utopia and find out how homosexuality, transgenderism, transhumanism and multiculturalism are reshaping society and redefining what it means to be human in the 21st century. My conclusion was that there are cultural, economical, political and social forces who are determined to destroy the traditional human model and replace it with a model that is confused, dependent, inept and impotent and yet at the same time, under the hypnotic influence of the media, the social net work, the fashion industry and chemical drugs enjoys the enslavement. In order to achieve their objective, the powers that be use various techniques and technologies. One of their techniques is to empower minorities such as homosexuals and transgeners and under the pretense of defending human rights of these minorities, they infiltrate and influence every level of society from elementary schools to scientific academics, the music industry, movie production studios, television networks and government offices and through education, policy and propaganda change personal perceptions and ultimately swing public opinions towards their desired direction. I emphasized on the public opinion about homosexuality as an example. According to Gallup statistics, in 2014, public support for same-sex marriage has reached an all time high of 55%. Approval of gay and lesbian relations increased 19% between 2001 and 2013. I argued this change in public support is in part due to an increase in portraying sympathetic gay and lesbian characters in books, movies, TV shows, video games, etc. In other words, such support is the result of a successful propaganda campaign.
One year after the publication of “Over the Rainbow” series, I decided to resume my study and see where we stand in 2015, and discovered that things have gotten much worse and conditioning is moving in an accelerated pace. For instance, I realized that the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender) movement has turned into a dominant social force who rules with an iron fist, gone are the days when only the rich and the famous were being targeted and harassed for speaking their opinion or making a none-LGBT friendly comment. Today, everybody has become a target of this tyrannical movement. Read some of news headlines of 2015 and see for yourself:
February 19, 2015: 70 year old Washington florist who refused to provide flowers for a gay couple’s wedding was found guilty of violating the state’s anti-discrimination law, and was ordered to pay $1000 in penalty, plus legal fees.
April 1, 2015: Indiana Pizza Place was forced to close doors after refusing to cater gay wedding. LGBT supporters harassed the store owners by threatening phone calls and via the social net work, and told them they will be killed and their store will be burnt to the ground.
April 25, 2015: The Oregon bakers who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding were fined $135,000 in a state court. The bakers attempted to raise funds to help them pay the court’s penalty without going bankrupt, but GoFundMe (crowd funding web site that allows people to raise money for events ranging from celebrations and graduations to illnesses and financial crises) shut down the support page which was put up by the bakers and cut off their support.
These are new realities of the 21st century America. It gets even stranger when you take into the consideration the fact that gays and lesbians make up only 1.6% of the US population, in other words, in a country with a population of more than 318,000,000, only about 9,000,000 are gay and lesbian. To put this into perspective, the entire US gay and lesbian population is less than the population of Los Angeles. That brings questions to mind such as:
– Why a minuscule group gets treated like a privileged class?
– Why the politicians pass draconian laws to protect the interests of this group and sentence their citizens, including a 70 year old grandmother, to cruel punishment?
– Why the corporate media constantly advocates and supports this group?
– Why the scientific community has kept silenced for several decades and why there has never been a fair, through and unbiased research into the causes and origins of homosexuality?
– Why the society has been forced to accept that nature is the only factor in determining a person’s sexual orientation and nurture, education, environment and life experiences have little or no effect?
I knew I couldn’t rely on the corporate media to find answers, so I began an independent research.
II. Engineering a Revolution
During research I came across some documents that shed light on the evolution of the LGBT movement from an oppressed minority into a totalitarian juggernaut in less than half a century. One of the documents is an article titled “The Homosexual Manifesto: An Essay on the Homosexual Revolution”, a document compiled by gay activist Michael Swift, first published in Gay Community News in February of 1987. This article, reprinted in the Congressional Records, is one of the most crucial doctrines of the LGBT movement. If you wonder why you may have not heard of it before, once you read it, you’ll understand why. The following is an excerpt of The Homosexual Manifesto, I highlighted the most important parts:
“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers, we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.
If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.
We shall write poems of the love between men, we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man, we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.
Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.
We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your Presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere, we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you, we may be sitting across the desk from you, we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.
There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.
The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.
All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only Gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.
The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.
We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.
We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.
Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.”
Look at today’s America and see how much of this man’s predictions have come true, look at what’s happening today and see if you can still say there is no such a thing as “Gay Agenda”.
Swift is a bold and out spoken gay activists and strategist, but he’s not alone. Tens of gay activists came together, designed a meticulous plan, and carried it out one step at a time. Understanding the importance of the media in American society, they focused heavily on infiltrating every aspects of the media from Hollywood studios to television networks and news organizations. In the book “After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s” which was published in 1989, gay activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen laid out a strategy to manipulate America to accept homosexuality by influencing the media. Marshall Kirk was a talented brain researcher while Hunter Madsen was a Harvard-trained expert in public persuasion tactics. They proposed to devise tactics on the American public that were remarkably similar to the brainwashing methods of the Communist China, mixed with Madison Avenue’s most persuasive advertisement techniques. Here is an excerpt of After the Ball:
“We shall use the very processes that made America hate us, to turn their hatred into warm regard, whether they like it or not.
The main thing is talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome. You can forget about trying right up front to persuade folks that homosexuality is a “good” thing, but if you can get them to think it is just “another” thing, meriting no more than a shrug of the shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won.
The average American watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the private world of straight people, through which a Trojan Horse might be passed.”
A look at today’s American TV programs reveals how successful this strategy has been in the past two decades. The trend of portraying likeable, sympathetic gay and lesbian characters started with NBC’S sitcom Will & Grace in the late 1990’s, and escalated on a fast pace. At the time of this writing, nearly 30 regular gay and lesbian characters are featured in various shows broadcasted by the major television networks every week.
Another point that Kirk and Madsen emphasized on was portraying gays as victims of circumstance and oppression, not as aggressive challengers:
“Gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection, so that straight people will be inclined, by reflex, to assume the role of protector.”
In that regard, the 2005 movie Brokeback Mountain and its commercial and critical success played a major role in influencing America’s opinion towards homosexuality. The movie tells the story of two cowboys who fall in love during the 1960’s, and are forced to hide their feelings for one another due to fear of public backlash, and eventually one of them falls victim to the assault of the angry mob. At the time of the release of Brokeback Mountain in 2005, gay marriage was illegal in most states across America and many gays and lesbians were hiding their sexual orientations. At the time of this writing in 2015, gay marriage has become legalized in most states across America, and not only gays and lesbians have came out of closets, but they demand to be praised for their sexual orientation, they demand to have special privileges such as teaching homosexuality related lessons in elementary schools, and with help from the media and the legal system, they mercilessly prosecute, punish and vilify anybody who dares to disagree with their way of life. The tables have truly turned.
Brokeback Mountain is a success story, but it’s not an isolated event. Gays have long had a strong influence in Hollywood, and for several decades, have been affecting the business of making movies in every aspect, sometimes overtly, sometimes covertly. Here is an example of covert gay influence in Hollywood: There is a tradition among the A-list male actors that can be traced back to the 1950’s. This tradition consists of male actors putting on makeup and dressing as women. They do this in different contexts, sometimes the entire plot of a movie revolves around men dressing as women (i.e. Some Like It Hot, Tootsie, Mrs. Doubtfire, etc.), in other occasions, male actors put on dress in comedy sketches in TV programs such as Saturday Night Live, and sometimes they do that for magazine photo sets. Regardless of the context, this tradition has been going on for a long time, and almost 95% of male actors have done this at least once during their career. Actor Dave Chappelle referred to this tradition on several occasions when speaking about what he called “the effeminization of men in Hollywood”, intentionally portraying men in feminine ways. As the story goes, one day during taping his show, Chappelle arrived on the scene and went to his room where he found a dress which had been placed there for him to wear in a comedy sketch. Chappelle refused to wear the dress, and that put him at odds with the studio managers and ultimately he chose to cancel his Comedy Central show and was eventually forced out of the Hollywood mainstream and got pushed to the side. It appears actors don’t have much of a choice, either they must comply with this bizarre and humiliating tradition and put on a dress at least once during their career, or they will be kicked to the curb.
Here is how you can see for yourself: Open any search page, on top of the page, choose “Images”, in search box, type: A-list Actor in Drag, then sit back and watch on your screen the flood of pictures of your favorite actors dressed up as women. Everybody is there, from Sean Connery to Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp, Kevin Spacey, James Franco, and the list goes on and on. Or if you tend to search for a specific actor, type his name and the word “Drag”, for example: George Clooney Drag. When too many actors, over the course of several decades, do the same thing over and over again, it cannot be ruled out as a coincidence. Rather, it seems like some kind of a hazing ritual, and before you wonder what kind of a ritual is this, allow me to explain that hazing rituals are bizarre acts by the nature. For instance let’s consider Skull and Bones. This secret society, founded by drug lord and opium trader William Huntington Russell in 1832 at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, has included Presidents, cabinet officers, Supreme Court justices, captains of industry, and often their sons and lately their daughters, a social and political network like no other. 16 American Presidents including George Bush father and son are lifetime members of this secretive cabal that each year only accepts 15 new members. As part of their initiation ceremony, new members wrestle in mud, masturbate naked in a coffin while the old members circle around them and watch them and confess to their sexual desires and perversions before the old members. So before you think it’s strange for an actor to dress as a woman and participate in a hazing ritual, think about this: 16 American Presidents had laid naked in a tomb and masturbated in front of old members of a secretive club.
The question is: Who has established the tradition of cross-dressing in Hollywood, and for what purpose? The ritual may have been invented by some gay Hollywood producers with the intention of humiliating and ridiculing straight men and traditional family values. This is what Michael Swift meant when he wrote:
“We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.”
All this brings us to a critical question: Why economical, political and social institutions play along and carry out the gay agenda and favor a group of minorities over the rest of society?
III. Partners in Profit
Virtually all power players benefit from the progression of the LGBT movement. Promoting the gay agenda and attracting the masses to homosexuality from an early age will lead to the increase of gay population and consequently decline of traditional family unit and the values that are associated with it. In the eyes of the establishment, family unit, alongside with cultural heritage and private ownership are considered threats to globalization. Hence they will devise any tactic that will result in destabilizing and weakening such threats. Teaching homosexuality related lessons in elementary schools is one of their tactics. In 2015, “And Tango Makes Three” came third in a list of titles the American Library Association had received the most complaints for from parents. The book tells the story of two male penguins who hatched an egg at the New York Zoo, and is being studied at elementary schools. Many parents believe that children should not be exposed to sexually related content at such a young age, and accuse the education system of intentionally promoting a homosexual agenda.
Furthermore, gays are more receptive to lifelong chronic diseases such as HIV that can be managed by taking expensive drugs, and that fact makes them ideal consumers in the eyes of billion dollar pharmaceutical corporations and their powerful lobby groups.
On the other hand, as gay marriage battles intensify in America, civil right attorneys make more money by taking on the states and businesses and individuals. The following is an excerpt from a report published by Reuters on April 16, 2015:
“As a historic constitutional showdown over gay marriage looms this month at the U.S. Supreme Court, attorneys are fighting over another bitterly disputed issue: Their fees.
The battles over billables are erupting far from the Washington, D.C., limelight, in lower courts from West Virginia to Wisconsin and Oklahoma. They pit lawyers representing gay couples who challenged same-sex marriage bans against the states that had enacted the laws.
Typically in the United States, each party pays its own lawyers. But under special laws designed to encourage civil rights cases against the government, parties who win can petition the county, state or other entity they sued for “reasonable” attorneys’ fees and costs.
In some cases, the fee requests run well into seven figures and are submitted on behalf of powerful law firms that a Reuters examination found have outsized access to the Supreme Court. Individuals and advocacy groups that file lawsuits aimed at the high court sometimes retain big-firm lawyers who specialize in arguing in that forum and boast remarkable success rates in getting their cases heard.
Gay marriage litigation, especially, has become a magnet for prominent lawyers and national firms with connections to the Supreme Court. These firms can bill at $1,000 an hour or more, and when they or other Supreme Court experts seek repayment from state coffers at even discounted rates, the rhetoric gets nasty.
“They used a howitzer to kill a gnat.” wrote Tulsa County, Oklahoma, in objecting to a $368,827 fee request in January. The local lawyer for the lesbian couple who brought the case had recruited a team that included a University of Oklahoma constitutional law professor who is a former Supreme Court law clerk and who billed at $400 per hour.”
Certain groups are pushing certain agendas under the pretence of protecting gay rights, but in reality, it comes down to two things: Money and power to control, the most ancient motives in human history. Slowly but steadily, people begin to realize this fact. Slowly and steadily, resistance is building up. Every time someone falls victim to vicious attacks and prosecution of the LGBT movement, support from every corner of America comes pouring in. For instance thousands of people had donated thousands of dollars to the florist, the bakers and the restaurant owners who have been punished for their refusal to cater gay weddings. In April of 2015, a number of activists held a three hour press conference prior to oral arguments at the Supreme Court on the issue of marriage equality. During the conference, activist Matt Barber stated:
“Same-sex marriage and the free exercise of religion, particularly biblical Christianity, cannot coexist in harmony, Christians are being forced to call evil good and good evil. If the current trend continues, we fear soon there will be no room left for any limitation on what can constitute human sexuality. We cannot and will not allow this to occur on our watch.
We were hearing a lot of talk about revolution. Well, revolution is at hand.”
IV. In Closing
I have no intention whatsoever to offend any person or group in any form, shape or manner. I don’t have any personal grudge against gay people, on the contrary, I believe they deserve the same civil and legal rights as heterosexuals. I don’t value people based on their gender or sexual orientation, I value them based on their personal merit. I believe, based on the evidence and proof presented in this article, that the gay agenda is a reality and is being implemented in every aspect of today’s society. However, it’s important to note that there are certain elements such as the LGBT lobby groups within the gay community who pursuit this agenda, and we should not hold all gays responsible for the wrongdoings of a few members of their community.
For the longest time, we’ve heard the argument that gays are born that way and their sexual orientation is the result of their hormone mix-up and elements such as nurture, education, environment and life experiences have little or no effect on determining a person’s sexual orientation. This is the strongest argument offered by gay advocates. In response, anti-gay advocates argue that although the importance of the nature and hormone mix-up cannot be ruled out, but nurture and upbringing also have a fundamental impact on shaping and/or re-shaping a person’s sexuality. They point out to life in prison as an example. Regardless of their nature and hormone mix-up, every man who enters the prison environment will become homosexual, because there is no other option available in prison. That’s a clear, undisputed example of environmental effect on human sexuality. By the same token, when children are being thought homosexuality related lessons in elementary schools, that education will leave a permanent effect on their psyche, will plant the seeds of homosexuality in their subconscious mind, and can and will lead them down a path that they have not chosen by free will. The truth that gay activists may find inconvenient is that both nature and nurture play significant roles in establishing a person’s sexual identity, therefore the children must be kept out of the equation and be allowed to grow up and discover their sexual identity on their own without the adult intervention, without couching and without influence. Teaching sexually related lessons to elementary school children is one of many examples of how the LGBT movement is pushing the gay agenda on the American society, and the American society has started to push back.
We are at a historical tipping point. If the rogue elements within the gay community don’t change their behavior and continue to enforce their agenda and attack, harass, prosecute and punish everybody who doesn’t agree with their sexual orientation and lifestyle, soon there will be conflict, anarchy and violence, and that is bad for the entire society. Even several moderate gay activists have expressed their concern and have warned against dangerous consequences of fascist behavior of their colleagues. The oppressed minority has become the oppressor, the LGBT movement has turned into the same monster it once fought, the monster of bigotry, hatred and intolerance, and this monster must be confronted. Think about it: When a 70 year old religious woman is being prosecuted for her refusal to cater a gay wedding in a country where freedom of religion is a constitutional right, when she is being put on trial for her belief, that’s when you have to acknowledge it has gone too far.
However, I strongly condemn anarchy, violence and oppression of any kind, perpetrated by any party. There is no excuse for the bad behavior. Period. In my view, the only way we can get through this crisis is by engaging in a dialogue, by tolerance and understanding. Gays need to accept the fact that a society is made up of various factions with various beliefs, and they will never gain the approval of all factions and all beliefs, no matter what they do, and by prosecuting a 70 year old woman, not only they won’t gain any support or sympathy, but on the contrary, they will create anger and animosity. When too much anger and animosity build up, it will lead to backlash, repercussion and unforeseen consequences. Tragedy is looming over us, we must put our hands together and prevent that from happening. There is room for all of us, as long as we get along and don’t tread on one another. After all, we’re in this together, this crazy thing called humanity.